Staging intimacy with consent: U of T Mississauga brings in special director
Issues of sexual harassment and male-female power dynamics are dominating the cultural conversation. How do these matters come into play in the world of theatre, where actors must sometimes navigate intimate scenes?
The 狐狸视频 Mississauga and Sheridan College are working to ensure students in its theatre and drama studies program can practise their craft in a safe and comfortable way. For its season-opening production of Metamorphoses, U of T Mississauga's Theatre Erindale hired an intimacy director to provide guidance on performing in physically intimate scenes in ways that involve respect for personal boundaries. The theatre produced a .
鈥淲ith some material in this play, we had to take a lot of care in how we approach it,鈥 says David Matheson, co-ordinator of the theatre and drama studies program and director of Metamorphoses. 鈥淚t was very important that students learn techniques to deal with the material in a respectful manner.鈥
Last year, Matheson hired intimacy director Siobhan Richardson, co-founder of the not-for-profit organization Intimacy Directors International and of the resource Canadian Intimacy for Stage and Screen. At the time, she assisted with a stage production that involved a sexual assault scene 鈥 an experience believed to be the first time a post-secondary school in Canada incorporated this kind of role into a theatre production.
When Richardson joined this year鈥檚 production of Metamorphoses, she first led a workshop with the entire company on the essentials of approaching intimate scenes in a sensitive way. She addressed the kind of language to use when discussing such material 鈥 they aren鈥檛 make-out scenes, but intimacy scenes.
Richardson also introduced the concept of tagging in and out, where actors can give each other high fives as they enter and exit scenes. The purpose is to allow actors to clearly mark the start and end of intimate scenes and analyze them. This approach was useful to actor Gillian Clare, who is involved in a sexually transgressive scene in the play.
鈥淏ecause my scene is so intense, it鈥檚 important to leave it behind,鈥 Clare says. 鈥淚t allows me to step out of a scene to discuss it and talk about what worked and what didn鈥檛. It separates me the actor from me the person. It鈥檚 a safeguard that makes rehearsal more enjoyable.鈥
Richardson also guided the choreography of the intimate scenes by providing opportunities for the actors to indicate which types of movements and touches were acceptable to them. The process involved teaching the actors to acknowledge and clearly communicate their personal boundaries, practise saying no and understand consent.
鈥淲e learned how to figure out what we need for safety as actors, and how to talk with scene partners to figure out what works,鈥 Clare says.
鈥淪he would say to the actors, 鈥楧o you feel comfortable touching or being touched here, or there? Let鈥檚 be specific about where the hands go, where the feet go, the tempo, the physical way the bodies are connecting, the duration,鈥欌 Matheson says. 鈥淭hey learned to have an open conversation with each other about the choreography.鈥
Matheson says about intimacy coaching, "We needed this 20 years ago.鈥滿atheson says.
鈥淚t was always necessary, we鈥檙e just realizing it now," Clare adds.
Matheson plans to include intimacy training in theatre training on a more regular basis. He says creating a psychologically safe rehearsal space is not only an end in itself, but it also helps improve the quality of intimacy scenes.
鈥淏ecause they know the rules of what they can and can鈥檛 do in an intimacy scene, the students can allow themselves to be vulnerable and drop their internalized barriers,鈥 Matheson says. 鈥淭hey don鈥檛 have to be inhibited and can fully commit. The rules set them free and let them be more creative.鈥